Progress against the field
Jack Randell has dropped 0:28 behind the field from Rome 2025 to Birmingham 2026.
The clock says 5:16 faster, but the races themselves got 5:44 quicker for everyone.
185 days between Cardiff 2026 and Birmingham 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:17 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
12 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men59:1293/1035Beat 91%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025, with Ashley Eagling 1:30 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:22 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:52 faster for everyone, so 1:30 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →0:52 faster This pair2:22 faster -
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:08:45 PB98/677Beat 86%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 1:17 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:00 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:43 faster for everyone, so 1:17 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →1:43 faster This athlete3:00 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:11:4583/456Beat 82%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026 1:35 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:54 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:29 faster for everyone, so 1:35 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:29 faster This athlete1:54 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:13:39121/551Beat 78%
↑ 117 days after Rome 2025 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 0:32 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:10 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:32 faster This athlete0:22 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:01:34233/1815Beat 87%
↑ 187 days after Riga 2025, with Ashley Eagling 2:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:01 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:20 faster for everyone, so 2:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:20 faster This pair2:01 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:01359/1367Beat 74%
-
Riga31 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:3528/252Beat 89%
-
Berlin16 May 2025Doubles Open · Men57:55 PB70/1325Beat 95%
-
London3 May 2025Relay · Men59:5417/67Beat 75%
-
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:1029/304Beat 91%
-
Paris9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:04:00102/865Beat 88%
-
Poznan2 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:0879/265Beat 70%