Progress against the field
Between London Excel 2025 and Cardiff 2026, Megan Addy pulled 2:38 ahead of the field.
The clock says 3:47 faster, but the races themselves got 1:09 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:27:51 PB134/351Beat 62%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 2:38 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:38 better than the field: 3:47 faster on the clock, against 1:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This athlete3:47 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:31:38845/1542Beat 45%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:25:00 PB184/267Beat 31%
↑ 182 days after London 2024, with James Woodcock 2:51 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:15 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:06 faster for everyone, so 2:51 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:06 faster This pair2:15 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:27:15362/521Beat 31%