Progress against the field
From Dublin 2025 to Birmingham 2026, Chloe Lane got 1:37 faster than the field.
The clock says 6:23 faster, but the races themselves got 4:46 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from London Excel 2025 → Cardiff 2026: 5:09 in 146 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:28:12 PB335/887Beat 62%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026 0:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:10 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:43 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:33 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:43 faster This athlete2:10 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:30:22115/253Beat 55%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025 5:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:09 better than the field: 6:18 faster on the clock, against 1:09 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:09 faster This athlete6:18 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:36:401030/1542Beat 33%
↑ 22 days after Dublin 2025 2:59 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:59 behind the field: 2:05 slower on the clock, against 0:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:54 faster This athlete2:05 slower -
Dublin12 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:34:35248/423Beat 41%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:21:26 PB331/904Beat 63%