Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2026 and Cardiff 2026, Robyn Broad lost 10:28 to the field.
The clock says 5:22 slower, but the races themselves got 5:06 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Geneva9 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:27:53 PB144/206Beat 30%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Individual Open · Women1:38:25386/646Beat 40%
↑ 49 days after Glasgow 2026 4:03 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:03 behind the field: 2:31 slower on the clock, against 1:32 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:32 faster This athlete2:31 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:35:54575/1084Beat 47%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 6:25 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:51 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:34 faster for everyone: 6:25 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 faster This athlete2:51 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:33:03 PB122/263Beat 54%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:20:52 PB571/1599Beat 64%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Natalie Bath 4:28 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:58 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:30 faster for everyone, so 4:28 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:30 faster This pair6:58 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:50241/411Beat 41%