Skip to content
Athlete United Kingdom

Todd Fierro

Since 2022, Todd Fierro has raced HYROX 18 times across 5 categories, the men's Doubles Pro most often (7). 59:49 at London Excel 2025 is the fastest of 7 in the men's Doubles Pro, 74th of 312 men's teams and ahead of 76% of the field. In the top 10% of the field 7 times.

Best finish, by category
Doubles Pro · Men
59:49
London Excel 2025
Individual Open · Men
1:05:12
Manchester 2025
Doubles Open · Men
57:46
Glasgow 2025
Individual Pro · Men
1:16:18
Manchester 2026
Doubles Open · Mixed
59:43
London 2025

Progress against the field

Between Birmingham 2023 and Glasgow 2026, Todd Fierro lost 10:23 to the field.

The clock says 2:56 faster, but the races themselves got 13:19 quicker for everyone.

Time ahead of the field Up is better
Birmingham 2023 Glasgow 2026
Race by race, in the list below ↓
How this is worked out ⓘ

A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.

Every race

18 races · 18 events

  1. Birmingham
    31 Oct 2026
    Doubles Pro · Men
    1:01:00
    154/476
    Beat 68%
    ↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Lee Forrester 2:44 worse than the field Why ↓

    0:27 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:17 faster for everyone: 2:44 lost to the field.

    Compare these two →
  2. Cardiff
    29 Apr 2026
    Doubles Pro · Men
    1:00:33
    75/302
    Beat 75%
    ↑ 36 days after London Olympia 2026, with Lee Forrester 0:54 better than the field Why ↓

    0:11 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:43 slower for everyone: 0:54 better than the field.

    Compare these two →
  3. London Olympia
    24 Mar 2026
    Doubles Pro · Men
    1:00:44
    108/484
    Beat 78%
    ↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Lee Forrester 1:26 worse than the field Why ↓

    0:55 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:31 faster for everyone: 1:26 lost to the field.

    Compare these two →
  4. Glasgow
    11 Mar 2026
    Individual Open · Men
    1:09:41
    63/613
    Beat 90%
    ↑ 166 days after Rome 2025 3:00 worse than the field Why ↓

    3:00 behind the field: 1:24 slower on the clock, against 1:36 faster for everyone.

    Compare these two →
  5. Manchester
    21 Jan 2026
    Individual Pro · Men
    1:16:18 PB
    63/121
    Beat 48%
  6. London Excel
    4 Dec 2025
    Doubles Pro · Men
    59:49 PB
    74/312
    Beat 76%
    ↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025, with Lee Forrester 0:36 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    1:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:36 behind the field.

    Compare these two →
  7. Birmingham
    22 Oct 2025
    Doubles Pro · Men
    59:56
    25/102
    Beat 76%
  8. Rome
    26 Sep 2025
    Individual Open · Men
    1:08:17
    149/1367
    Beat 89%
    ↑ 245 days after Manchester 2025 6:15 worse than the field Why ↓

    6:15 behind the field: 3:05 slower on the clock, against 3:10 faster for everyone.

    Compare these two →
  9. Cardiff
    30 May 2025
    Doubles Pro · Men
    1:00:53
    10/63
    Beat 84%
  10. London
    3 May 2025
    Doubles Open · Mixed
    59:43 PB
    19/956
    Beat 98%
  11. Glasgow
    12 Mar 2025
    Doubles Open · Men
    57:46 PB
    64/947
    Beat 93%
    ↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Lee Forrester 1:18 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    1:47 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:05 faster for everyone, so 1:18 was lost on the field.

    Compare these two →
  12. Manchester
    24 Jan 2025
    Individual Open · Men
    1:05:12 PB
    76/1191
    Beat 94%
    ↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024 0:58 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    2:54 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:52 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:58 behind the field.

    Compare these two →
  13. London
    29 Nov 2024
    Doubles Open · Men
    59:33
    30/444
    Beat 93%
  14. Birmingham
    25 Oct 2024
    Individual Open · Men
    1:08:06
    111/1916
    Beat 94%
    ↑ 370 days after Birmingham 2023 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    4:31 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:41 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:10 behind the field.

    Compare these two →
  15. Birmingham
    21 Oct 2023
    Individual Open · Men
    1:12:37
    114/1182
    Beat 90%
  16. Glasgow
    11 Feb 2023
    Doubles Open · Men
    1:01:58
    47/343
    Beat 86%
    ↑ 119 days after Birmingham 2022, with Alan Sutherland 0:22 better than the field Why ↓

    0:22 better than the field: 3:57 faster on the clock, against 3:35 faster for everyone.

    Compare these two →
  17. Birmingham
    15 Oct 2022
    Doubles Open · Men
    1:05:55
    94/358
    Beat 74%
  18. St. Gallen
    Date unknown
    Doubles Pro · Men
    1:01:32
    11/103
    Beat 89%

Personal bests, by station

3:39
Glasgow 2025
1:20
Birmingham 2022
2:30
Glasgow 2025
2:04
London Excel 2025
3:59
London Olympia 2026
1:25
Glasgow 2025
2:42
London 2024
3:19
Birmingham 2022

Station by station, race by race

Doubles Open · Men Individual Open · Men Doubles Pro · Men Faster is lower
1000m SkiErg
4:13 3:39
50m Sled Push
2:40 1:20
50m Sled Pull
3:40 2:30
80m Burpee Broad Jump
4:10 2:04
1000m Row
4:44 3:59
200m Farmers Carry
2:07 1:25
100m Sandbag Lunges
5:09 2:42
Wall Balls
5:27 3:19