Progress against the field
Between Cardiff 2026 and Birmingham 2026, Anthony Timms and Mike McFarland pulled 5:11 ahead of the field.
The clock says 7:28 faster, but the races themselves got 2:17 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Pro · Men, with Mike McFarland, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:01:28 PB171/476Beat 64%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Mike McFarland 5:11 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:28 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:17 faster for everyone, so 5:11 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:17 faster This pair7:28 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:08:56176/302Beat 42%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:03:24 PB145/917Beat 84%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025, with Adam Timms 0:12 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:43 faster on the clock, yet the race was 0:55 faster for everyone, so 0:12 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:55 faster This pair0:43 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:32407/2102Beat 81%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:07233/1177Beat 80%
-
Copenhagen14 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:07:03246/736Beat 67%