Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2026 and Glasgow 2026, Tim Cutler lost 2:57 to the field.
The clock says 0:32 slower, but the races themselves got 2:25 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:00:55 PB66/605Beat 89%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Jack Reeson 0:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:08 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:36 faster for everyone, so 0:28 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:36 faster This pair1:08 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:02:0354/522Beat 90%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:58143/613Beat 77%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 2:57 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:25 faster for everyone: 2:57 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete0:32 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:26 PB373/1463Beat 75%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Men1:18:59 PB292/467Beat 38%
↑ 188 days after Cardiff 2025 9:53 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
11:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:01 faster for everyone, so 9:53 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →2:01 faster This athlete11:54 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Pro · Men1:30:5390/112Beat 20%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:44 PB82/309Beat 74%