Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 12:17 on Craig Webb.
Over the same races everyone got 5:28 quicker, so 6:49 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
331 days between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 11:54 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:08:43456/1035Beat 56%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:26:33217/359Beat 40%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 11:54 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:31 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:23 faster for everyone: 11:54 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:23 faster This athlete10:31 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:05:06 PB49/207Beat 76%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:02 PB857/2779Beat 69%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 4:51 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:51 better than the field: 7:53 faster on the clock, against 3:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete7:53 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:23:55708/1600Beat 56%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025 5:14 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:11 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:03 faster for everyone: 5:14 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:03 faster This athlete4:11 slower -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:44677/1445Beat 53%