Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Susan Cranswick and Michelle Dixon lost 2:28 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:26 quicker, so 3:58 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
185 days between Cardiff 2026 and Birmingham 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 2:39 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:0569/585Beat 88%
↑ 185 days after Cardiff 2026, with Michelle Dixon 2:39 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:39 behind the field: 1:00 slower on the clock, against 1:39 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:39 faster This pair1:00 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:13:05 PB42/430Beat 90%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026, with Michelle Dixon 2:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:59 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:10 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:59 faster This pair2:49 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:15:54232/1155Beat 80%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025, with Michelle Dixon 2:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:12 slower for everyone and the clock still says 2:09 faster: 2:21 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:12 slower This pair2:09 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:03228/904Beat 75%