Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2024 and Birmingham 2026, Lee Robinson and Emma Stone lost 8:37 to the field.
The clock says 3:53 faster, but the races themselves got 12:30 quicker for everyone.
221 days between London Olympia 2026 and Birmingham 2026 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 1:14 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Emma Stone, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
21 races · 15 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed59:0314/586Beat 98%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Emma Stone 1:14 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:09 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:05 faster for everyone: 1:14 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:05 faster This pair0:09 slower -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:0520/491Beat 96%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026, with Amy John 3:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:45 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:46 faster for everyone: 3:31 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:46 faster This pair0:45 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed58:542/213Beat 99%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Emma Stone 2:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:32 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:37 faster for everyone: 2:09 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:37 faster This pair0:32 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:04:2230/897Beat 97%
↑ 62 days after Manchester 2026 6:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:58 behind the field: 2:52 slower on the clock, against 4:06 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:06 faster This athlete2:52 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:2041/824Beat 95%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:01:308/529Beat 99%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 0:15 better than the field Slower on the clock, ahead of the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:52 slower on the clock, but the race was 1:07 slower for everyone, so this was 0:15 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete0:52 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed58:22 PB15/1372Beat 99%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Emma Stone 2:07 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:48 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:07 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This pair0:41 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:00:38 PB47/2779Beat 98%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 0:06 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
Moved with the field: 2:56 faster on the clock, against 3:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete2:56 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed59:0314/954Beat 99%
↑ 26 days after Rome 2025, with Emma Stone 0:37 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:57 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 0:37 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair0:57 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:03:3447/1600Beat 97%
↑ 145 days after Cardiff 2025 2:17 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:17 better than the field: 4:53 faster on the clock, against 2:36 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:36 faster This athlete4:53 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men53:07 PB3/775Beat 100%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:0018/655Beat 97%
↑ 198 days after Glasgow 2025, with Emma Stone 1:02 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:02 better than the field: 3:02 faster on the clock, against 2:00 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:00 faster This pair3:02 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:08:27145/1401Beat 90%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed59:4822/956Beat 98%
↑ 99 days after Manchester 2025, with Emma Stone 7:18 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:18 better than the field: 10:57 faster on the clock, against 3:39 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:39 faster This pair10:57 faster -
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:05:34 PB109/236Beat 54%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:0231/841Beat 96%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Emma Stone 2:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:01 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:29 faster for everyone, so 2:28 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:29 faster This pair0:01 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:45204/733Beat 72%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:03:0326/795Beat 97%
↑ 20 days after Manchester 2024, with Emma Stone 1:04 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:04 behind the field: 0:07 slower on the clock, against 0:57 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:57 faster This pair0:07 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:02:5632/410Beat 92%
-
Birmingham21 Oct 2023Doubles Open · Men1:03:0553/467Beat 89%
-
Manchester28 Jan 2023Individual Pro · Men1:22:04 PB39/97Beat 60%