Progress against the field
Eryl Hooson has dropped 5:50 behind the field from Manchester 2024 to Glasgow 2025.
Over the same races everyone got 3:02 quicker, so 2:48 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:07:39 PB137/430Beat 68%
↑ 189 days after Birmingham 2025, with Joe Crawford 0:45 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:13 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:58 faster for everyone, so 0:45 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:58 faster This pair1:13 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Men1:08:52443/1177Beat 62%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:24:05856/1445Beat 41%
↑ 123 days after Manchester 2024 5:50 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:50 behind the field: 2:48 slower on the clock, against 3:02 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete2:48 slower -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:21:17 PB639/1206Beat 47%