Skip to content
Athlete United Kingdom

Elese Kilgariff

Since 2025, Elese Kilgariff has raced HYROX 6 times across 2 categories, the women's Doubles Open most often (4). 1:11:57 at Cardiff 2026 is the fastest of 4 in the women's Doubles Open, 32nd of 399 women's teams and inside the top 10%. With Keeley Mccarthy both times, that is 9:05 quicker on the clock than the first of them, at London 2025.

Best finish, by category
Doubles Open · Women
1:11:57
Cardiff 2026
Individual Open · Women
1:20:08
Malaga 2026

Progress against the field

From London 2025 to Cardiff 2026, Elese Kilgariff and Keeley Mccarthy got 4:28 faster than the field.

Over the same races everyone got 4:37 quicker, so 9:05 faster on the clock looks better than it was.

Time ahead of the field Up is better
London 2025 Cardiff 2026

The biggest step was London 2025 → Birmingham 2025: 3:13 on the field in 172 days.

Race by race, in the list below ↓
How this is worked out ⓘ

A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Keeley Mccarthy, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.

Every race

6 races · 6 events

  1. Cardiff
    29 Apr 2026
    Doubles Open · Women
    1:11:57 PB
    32/399
    Beat 92%
    ↑ 168 days after Dublin 2025, with Keeley Mccarthy 1:48 better than the field Why ↓

    1:48 better than the field: 2:56 faster on the clock, against 1:08 faster for everyone.

    Compare these two →
  2. Malaga
    16 Apr 2026
    Individual Open · Women
    1:20:08 PB
    57/329
    Beat 83%
    ↑ 85 days after Manchester 2026 1:34 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    3:20 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:54 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:34 behind the field.

    Compare these two →
  3. Manchester
    21 Jan 2026
    Individual Open · Women
    1:23:28
    220/825
    Beat 73%
  4. Dublin
    12 Nov 2025
    Doubles Open · Women
    1:14:53
    152/719
    Beat 79%
    ↑ 21 days after Birmingham 2025, with Keeley Mccarthy 0:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓

    2:05 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:38 faster for everyone, so 0:33 was lost on the field.

    Compare these two →
  5. Birmingham
    22 Oct 2025
    Doubles Open · Women
    1:16:58
    241/1111
    Beat 78%
    ↑ 172 days after London 2025, with Keeley Mccarthy 3:13 better than the field Why ↓

    4:04 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:51 faster for everyone, so 3:13 of it was this pair.

    Compare these two →
  6. London
    3 May 2025
    Doubles Open · Women
    1:21:02
    444/1118
    Beat 60%

Personal bests, by station

4:27
London 2025
1:35
Dublin 2025
3:12
Cardiff 2026
3:35
Cardiff 2026
4:35
Cardiff 2026
1:47
Birmingham 2025
0:03
Malaga 2026
3:18
Cardiff 2026

Station by station, race by race

Doubles Open · Women Individual Open · Women Faster is lower
1000m SkiErg
4:42 4:27
50m Sled Push
2:32 1:35
50m Sled Pull
5:09 3:12
80m Burpee Broad Jump
6:32 3:35
1000m Row
5:04 4:35
200m Farmers Carry
2:10 1:47
100m Sandbag Lunges
4:07 0:03
Wall Balls
5:24 3:18