Progress against the field
Between Glasgow 2025 and Malaga 2026, Megan Ready and Danielle Kettle lost 0:40 to the field.
The clock says 4:15 faster, but the races themselves got 4:55 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:23:31 PB564/1246Beat 55%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:20:44 PB138/246Beat 44%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:46222/477Beat 54%
↑ 155 days after Dublin 2025, with Danielle Kettle 0:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:27 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:23 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:27 faster This pair1:04 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:23:3517/24Beat 29%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:41:08 PB937/1379Beat 32%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:25:50307/525Beat 42%
↑ 245 days after Glasgow 2025, with Danielle Kettle 0:17 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:11 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:28 faster for everyone, so 0:17 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:28 faster This pair3:11 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:29:01455/796Beat 43%