Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Birmingham 2025, Jack Quigley lost 0:20 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:39 quicker, so 4:19 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:36:06222/246Beat 10%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:12:28 PB206/279Beat 26%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:19:32 PB682/1821Beat 63%
↑ 362 days after Birmingham 2024 0:20 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:19 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:39 faster for everyone, so 0:20 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:39 faster This athlete4:19 faster -
Valencia17 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:31 PB232/555Beat 58%
-
Riga31 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:21:52152/264Beat 42%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:38 PB267/719Beat 63%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:23:51366/816Beat 55%