Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2024 to Manchester 2025, the field gained 3:01 on Christopher Dodd.
Over the same races everyone got 6:53 quicker, so 3:52 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:08:25 PB116/848Beat 86%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:48 PB272/1105Beat 75%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:10:15 PB206/1191Beat 83%
↑ 56 days after London 2024 2:16 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:20 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:16 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:20 faster This athlete0:04 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:10:19172/1637Beat 90%
↑ 20 days after Manchester 2024 1:38 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:38 better than the field: 1:57 faster on the clock, against 0:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:19 faster This athlete1:57 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Individual Open · Men1:12:16274/1206Beat 77%
↑ 15 days after Birmingham 2024 2:23 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:51 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:14 faster for everyone, so 2:23 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:14 faster This athlete1:51 faster -
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Individual Open · Men1:14:07157/816Beat 81%