Progress against the field
From London Olympia 2026 to Birmingham 2026, the field gained 0:30 on Anna Craig and Katie Tyler.
Over the same races everyone got 1:34 quicker, so 1:04 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Katie Tyler, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:09:37 PB28/585Beat 95%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Katie Tyler 0:30 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:04 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 0:30 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair1:04 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:33 PB210/848Beat 75%
↑ 334 days after Cardiff 2025, with Dan Craig 1:09 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:09 better than the field: 5:04 faster on the clock, against 3:55 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:55 faster This pair5:04 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:10:4175/867Beat 91%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:25:12 PB174/697Beat 75%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:37207/470Beat 56%