Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2026 to Birmingham 2026, Libby Abbott and Donna Nevitt Haggard got 0:29 faster than the field.
The clock says 3:52 faster, but the races themselves got 3:23 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Donna Nevitt Haggard, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:08:54 PB75/1246Beat 94%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:38231/341Beat 32%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026, with Donna Nevitt Haggard 0:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:52 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:23 faster for everyone, so 0:29 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:23 faster This pair3:52 faster -
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:25:42 PB551/848Beat 35%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:30:49575/867Beat 34%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Lily Jerrold 16:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
14:59 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:48 faster for everyone: 16:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:48 faster This pair14:59 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:34:301056/1618Beat 35%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:15:50412/1887Beat 78%