Progress against the field
Niall Mackenzie and Stuart Phipps have dropped 7:51 behind the field from London 2024 to Cardiff 2026.
Over the same races everyone got 7:38 quicker, so 0:13 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 315 days between Glasgow 2025 and Manchester 2026, cost 8:46 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:17:36330/566Beat 42%
↑ 98 days after Manchester 2026, with Stuart Phipps 2:08 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:40 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:08 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:40 faster This pair1:32 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Men1:15:5649/81Beat 40%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men1:19:08581/794Beat 27%
↑ 315 days after Glasgow 2025, with Stuart Phipps 8:46 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:46 behind the field: 7:53 slower on the clock, against 0:53 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:53 faster This pair7:53 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:23:48 PB704/1600Beat 56%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:11:15 PB522/947Beat 45%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Stuart Phipps 3:03 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:03 better than the field: 6:08 faster on the clock, against 3:05 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair6:08 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:17:23639/984Beat 35%