Progress against the field
From Manchester 2026 to Glasgow 2026, the field gained 2:31 on Charlotte Turnbull.
Over the same races everyone got 3:34 quicker, so 1:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
9 races · 9 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:51626/1246Beat 50%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:12:46 PB88/862Beat 90%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Emily Reeve 0:52 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:52 better than the field: 2:05 faster on the clock, against 1:13 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 faster This pair2:05 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:14:49 PB287/887Beat 68%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:20:43 PB35/318Beat 89%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 2:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:03 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:34 faster for everyone, so 2:31 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:34 faster This athlete1:03 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:21:46179/825Beat 78%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:51269/1599Beat 83%
-
Gdansk12 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:21:3597/265Beat 63%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:16:55158/529Beat 70%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:26:36385/796Beat 52%