Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Cardiff 2026, Rachel Tomkins and Olivia Langford got 11:17 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:45 quicker, so 16:02 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
267 days between Glasgow 2025 and London Excel 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 14:49 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Women1:19:4942/87Beat 52%
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:27:33468/862Beat 46%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Olivia Langford 3:32 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:19 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:13 faster for everyone: 3:32 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 faster This pair2:19 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:25:14 PB1053/1887Beat 44%
↑ 267 days after Glasgow 2025, with Olivia Langford 14:49 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
18:21 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:32 faster for everyone, so 14:49 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:32 faster This pair18:21 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:43:35933/1051Beat 11%