Progress against the field
From London 2025 to Cardiff 2026, Rachel Earl and Alice Reynolds got 0:46 faster than the field.
The clock says 4:08 faster, but the races themselves got 3:22 quicker for everyone.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 215 days between London 2025 and London Excel 2025, still ended 2:17 ahead of the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Cardiff29 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:28:03484/862Beat 44%
↑ 146 days after London Excel 2025, with Alice Reynolds 1:31 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:18 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:13 faster for everyone: 1:31 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:13 faster This pair0:18 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:22:51 PB68/174Beat 61%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:27:45946/1599Beat 41%
↑ 215 days after London 2025, with Alice Reynolds 2:17 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:26 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:09 faster for everyone, so 2:17 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:09 faster This pair4:26 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:44:091004/1111Beat 10%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Relay · Women1:33:0940/58Beat 31%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:32:11848/1118Beat 24%