Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2025 and Malaga 2025, Chloe McHugh and Katharine Deane lost 1:55 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:37 quicker, so 0:42 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
10 races · 8 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:01:03 PB3/715Beat 100%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Pro · Women1:22:23 PB86/146Beat 41%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:2616/657Beat 98%
-
Hamburg2 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:09:56 PB22/668Beat 97%
-
Barcelona25 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Women1:08:5013/578Beat 98%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Relay · Mixed1:02:569/35Beat 74%
-
Malaga21 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:4731/514Beat 94%
↑ 56 days after Manchester 2025, with Katharine Deane 1:55 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:37 faster for everyone, so 1:55 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:37 faster This pair0:42 faster -
Katowice22 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:06:41 PB41/275Beat 85%
-
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:10:2985/857Beat 90%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:13:4793/560Beat 83%