Progress against the field
From Malaga 2026 to Birmingham 2026, Adam Hague got 3:18 faster than the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 3:39 faster on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:12:15 PB85/359Beat 76%
↑ 198 days after Malaga 2026 3:18 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:18 better than the field: 3:39 faster on the clock, against 0:21 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:21 faster This athlete3:39 faster -
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:07:03 PB148/292Beat 49%
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Individual Open · Men1:15:54175/474Beat 63%
-
Copenhagen13 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:21:30351/900Beat 61%
↑ 142 days after Birmingham 2025 3:43 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:43 behind the field: 0:45 slower on the clock, against 2:58 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:58 faster This athlete0:45 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:15:19230/279Beat 18%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:02 PB1183/2102Beat 44%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:45734/1821Beat 60%
↑ 5 days after Valencia 2025 3:12 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:39 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:51 faster for everyone, so 3:12 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:51 faster This athlete0:39 faster -
Valencia17 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:21:24496/1018Beat 51%