Progress against the field
Between Birmingham 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Susan Bradfield and Thomas Huck pulled 1:45 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 4:04 quicker, so 5:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Mixed, with Thomas Huck, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:09:35 PB39/146Beat 73%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:05:24 PB12/904Beat 99%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:29 PB365/841Beat 57%
↑ 138 days after Birmingham 2024, with Thomas Huck 1:45 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:45 better than the field: 5:49 faster on the clock, against 4:04 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →4:04 faster This pair5:49 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Women1:19:56306/857Beat 64%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2024, with Natasha BYRNE 1:08 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:24 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:32 faster for everyone, so 1:08 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:32 faster This pair1:24 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:15:55109/486Beat 78%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:24:18596/894Beat 33%
-
Birmingham25 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Women1:21:20122/397Beat 69%