Progress against the field
From London 2024 to Malaga 2026, Amelia Reed and Annabel Grant got 2:48 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 7:04 quicker, so 9:52 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
363 days between London 2024 and Madrid 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 6:12 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:08:11 PB16/477Beat 97%
↑ 140 days after Madrid 2025, with Annabel Grant 3:24 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:45 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:09 faster for everyone, so 3:24 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:09 faster This pair1:45 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:55 PB618/1474Beat 58%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:09:5624/923Beat 97%
↑ 363 days after London 2024, with Annabel Grant 6:12 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:12 better than the field: 8:07 faster on the clock, against 1:55 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This pair8:07 faster -
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:18:03302/1150Beat 74%