Progress against the field
Between Malaga 2026 and Birmingham 2026, Emily Gladding and Julie Gladding lost 3:37 to the field.
The clock says 4:44 slower, but the races themselves got 1:07 slower for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Julie Gladding, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:44:081117/1246Beat 10%
↑ 198 days after Malaga 2026, with Julie Gladding 3:37 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:37 behind the field: 4:44 slower on the clock, against 1:07 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This pair4:44 slower -
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Women1:39:24399/477Beat 16%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:29:09 PB266/404Beat 34%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Fiona Burridge 5:12 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:54 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:42 faster for everyone, so 5:12 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:42 faster This pair7:54 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:37:03910/1111Beat 18%