Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2025 to Malaga 2026, Sarah Gorman and Matthew Akester got 1:31 faster than the field.
The clock says 7:04 faster, but the races themselves got 5:33 quicker for everyone.
224 days between Glasgow 2025 and Birmingham 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:44 better than the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:49125/546Beat 77%
↑ 133 days after London Excel 2025, with Matthew Akester 3:09 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:09 behind the field: 1:50 slower on the clock, against 1:19 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:19 faster This pair1:50 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:16224/1198Beat 81%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:59 PB269/1474Beat 82%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Matthew Akester 0:56 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:56 better than the field: 3:44 faster on the clock, against 2:48 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This pair3:44 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:13:43247/889Beat 72%
↑ 224 days after Glasgow 2025, with Matthew Akester 3:44 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:44 better than the field: 5:10 faster on the clock, against 1:26 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:26 faster This pair5:10 faster -
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:53375/861Beat 56%