Progress against the field
From Warsaw 2025 to London Excel 2025, the field gained 4:33 on Thomas Scott.
Over the same races everyone got 1:26 quicker, so 3:07 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 193 days between Warsaw 2025 and Birmingham 2025, cost 14:00 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Malaga16 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:10:03 PB263/607Beat 57%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:20:161224/2779Beat 56%
↑ 7 days after Madrid 2025 6:55 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:31 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:36 faster for everyone, so 6:55 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:36 faster This athlete10:31 faster -
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Open · Men1:30:47850/1312Beat 35%
↑ 36 days after Birmingham 2025 2:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:14 slower for everyone and the clock still says 2:18 faster: 2:32 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:14 slower This athlete2:18 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:33:051273/1821Beat 30%
↑ 193 days after Warsaw 2025 14:00 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
14:00 behind the field: 15:56 slower on the clock, against 1:56 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:56 slower This athlete15:56 slower -
Warsaw12 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:17:09 PB200/715Beat 72%