Progress against the field
Between Belgium 2025 and Mechelen 2026, Peter Penasse lost 9:48 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 8:44 quicker, so 1:04 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Rotterdam15 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:10:38 PB261/674Beat 61%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:24:35762/1363Beat 44%
↑ 104 days after Gent 2025 2:52 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:39 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:31 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:52 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:31 faster This athlete1:39 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:26:14811/1428Beat 43%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025 0:26 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:09 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:35 faster for everyone, so 0:26 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:35 faster This athlete5:09 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Individual Open · Men1:31:23720/1352Beat 47%
↑ 167 days after Belgium 2025 6:30 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:52 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:22 slower for everyone: 6:30 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:22 slower This athlete7:52 slower -
Belgium5 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:23:31 PB702/1638Beat 57%