Progress against the field
Between Brisbane 2025 and Brisbane 2026, William Upton and Sean Relph lost 1:39 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:12 quicker, so 3:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 3 events
-
Brisbane9 Apr 2026Relay · Men1:03:3315/39Beat 62%
-
Brisbane9 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Men1:01:18 PB24/357Beat 93%
↑ 216 days after Perth 2025, with Sean Relph 0:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:16 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:09 faster for everyone, so 0:53 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:09 faster This pair2:16 faster -
Perth5 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:3412/152Beat 92%
↑ 188 days after Brisbane 2025, with Sean Relph 0:46 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:03 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:46 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:03 faster This pair1:17 faster -
Brisbane1 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:04:51135/731Beat 82%