Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Glasgow 2026, Katharine Eadie got 0:22 faster than the field.
The races barely moved for everyone else, so 0:42 faster on the clock is close to the whole story.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:14:02 PB68/585Beat 88%
-
Bologna4 Apr 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:01 PB212/860Beat 75%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:19:4890/213Beat 58%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Adam Condon 6:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:52 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:09 faster for everyone: 6:01 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:09 faster This pair2:52 slower -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:24:47 PB79/324Beat 76%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025 0:22 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:42 faster on the clock, and the race was 0:20 faster for everyone, so 0:22 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 faster This athlete0:42 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:25:29397/1379Beat 71%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:56329/889Beat 63%