Progress against the field
Between Milan 2024 and Turin 2026, Guglielmo Platania and Thomas Molgora lost 2:52 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 11:10 quicker, so 8:18 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Rome23 Sep 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:34 PB27/292Beat 91%
-
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men55:4938/493Beat 92%
-
Turin30 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Men53:29 PB5/1060Beat 100%
↑ 56 days after Verona 2025, with Thomas Molgora 0:31 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:57 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:28 faster for everyone, so 0:31 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:28 faster This pair1:57 faster -
Verona5 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men55:264/1088Beat 100%
↑ 70 days after Rome 2025, with Thomas Molgora 1:28 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:32 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:00 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:28 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:00 faster This pair0:32 faster -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Men55:583/315Beat 99%
↑ 342 days after Milan 2024, with Thomas Molgora 0:53 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:49 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 6:42 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:53 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →6:42 faster This pair5:49 faster -
Milan19 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:01:4713/572Beat 98%