Progress against the field
From Maastricht 2025 to Maastricht 2026, the field gained 3:47 on Suzan Verberne and Ellen Poels.
The clock says 2:42 slower, but the races themselves got 1:05 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Ellen Poels, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:21:1376/240Beat 68%
↑ 365 days after Maastricht 2025, with Ellen Poels 3:47 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:42 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:05 faster for everyone: 3:47 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:05 faster This pair2:42 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:22:12124/285Beat 57%
-
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Women1:22:53278/828Beat 66%
↑ 274 days after Rotterdam 2025, with Liza Hanegraaf 1:25 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:19 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:44 faster for everyone, so 1:25 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:44 faster This pair1:19 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:18:31 PB164/739Beat 78%
-
Rotterdam27 Feb 2025Doubles Open · Women1:24:12117/272Beat 57%