Progress against the field
Between Maastricht 2025 and Maastricht 2026, Erin Langereis and Danique Van Den Hurk lost 5:16 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:28 quicker, so 0:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from Maastricht 2025 → Gent 2025: 3:21 in 84 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:39:46201/240Beat 16%
↑ 177 days after Mechelen 2026, with Danique Van Den Hurk 8:27 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
10:23 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:56 slower for everyone: 8:27 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:56 slower This pair10:23 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:29:23 PB245/380Beat 36%
↑ 104 days after Gent 2025, with Danique Van Den Hurk 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:34 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:44 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:10 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:44 faster This pair4:34 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:33:57650/882Beat 26%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025, with Danique Van Den Hurk 3:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
6:01 faster on the clock, and the race was 2:40 faster for everyone, so 3:21 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This pair6:01 faster -
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:39:58643/739Beat 13%