Progress against the field
Between Maastricht 2025 and Maastricht 2026, Danique Van Den Hurk and Erin Langereis lost 5:16 to the field.
The clock says 0:12 faster, but the races themselves got 5:28 quicker for everyone.
The largest gain on the field came from Maastricht 2025 → Gent 2025: 3:21 in 84 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2026Doubles Open · Women1:39:46201/240Beat 16%
↑ 177 days after Mechelen 2026, with Erin Langereis 8:27 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:27 behind the field: 10:23 slower on the clock, against 1:56 slower for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:56 slower This pair10:23 slower -
Mechelen26 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:29:23 PB245/380Beat 36%
↑ 104 days after Gent 2025, with Erin Langereis 0:10 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:34 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:44 faster for everyone, so 0:10 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:44 faster This pair4:34 faster -
Gent12 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:33:57650/882Beat 26%
↑ 84 days after Maastricht 2025, with Erin Langereis 3:21 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:21 better than the field: 6:01 faster on the clock, against 2:40 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:40 faster This pair6:01 faster -
Utrecht28 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:35:11 PB560/701Beat 20%
-
Maastricht19 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:39:58643/739Beat 13%