Progress against the field
From London Excel 2025 to Birmingham 2026, Frances Misener and Charlene Wyman got 1:56 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:22 quicker, so 5:18 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Charlene Wyman, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:18:58 PB381/1246Beat 69%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Charlene Wyman 0:20 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:20 better than the field: 1:54 faster on the clock, against 1:34 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair1:54 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Relay · Women1:23:0263/144Beat 56%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:20:52303/867Beat 65%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025, with Charlene Wyman 1:36 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:24 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:48 faster for everyone, so 1:36 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:48 faster This pair3:24 faster -
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Women1:27:22 PB339/507Beat 33%
↑ 117 days after Madrid 2025 2:58 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:09 faster on the clock, and the race was 5:11 faster for everyone, so 2:58 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →5:11 faster This athlete8:09 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Women1:24:16756/1599Beat 53%
-
Madrid27 Nov 2025Individual Open · Women1:35:31390/697Beat 44%