Progress against the field
Scott Powrie has dropped 1:56 behind the field from Birmingham 2025 to Glasgow 2026.
The clock says 0:31 faster, but the races themselves got 2:27 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
EMEA London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men56:4386/455Beat 81%
↑ 377 days after Glasgow 2025, with Jay Banning 0:14 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:29 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:43 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:14 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:43 faster This pair3:29 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:08:55 PB50/613Beat 92%
↑ 140 days after Birmingham 2025 1:56 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:31 faster on the clock, yet the race was 2:27 faster for everyone, so 1:56 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:27 faster This athlete0:31 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:09:26171/1600Beat 89%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:00:1292/1105Beat 92%
-
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men56:13 PB7/719Beat 99%