Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to London Olympia 2026, the field gained 6:30 on Harry Fuller.
Over the same races everyone got 4:56 quicker, so 1:34 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:18:08238/716Beat 67%
↑ 110 days after London Excel 2025 4:56 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:02 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:54 faster for everyone: 4:56 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:54 faster This athlete3:02 slower -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Pro · Men1:30:08 PB106/121Beat 12%
-
Poznan13 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:56 PB78/540Beat 86%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:06 PB737/2771Beat 73%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 1:34 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:28 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:34 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete1:28 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:16:34488/1821Beat 73%
-
Belgium5 Apr 2025Doubles Open · Men1:03:50110/898Beat 88%
-
Marseille7 Dec 2024Doubles Open · Men1:07:30195/729Beat 73%