Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and Manchester 2026, Jamie Daniels pulled 3:13 ahead of the field.
The races barely moved for everyone else, so 2:59 faster on the clock is close to the whole story.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Men, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Men1:33:45 PB595/693Beat 14%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Men1:09:52 PB321/484Beat 34%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:27:08 PB297/551Beat 46%
↑ 263 days after London 2025 3:13 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:59 faster on the clock in a race that was 0:14 slower for everyone: 3:13 better than the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:14 slower This athlete2:59 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:16:43 PB607/1474Beat 59%
↑ 370 days after London 2024, with Samantha Mcdermott 3:11 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:38 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:49 faster for everyone, which leaves this 3:11 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:49 faster This pair1:38 faster -
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Men1:30:071355/1917Beat 29%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:18:21210/521Beat 60%