Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2026 and Birmingham 2026, Danielle Johnson and Katie Bowler pulled 2:29 ahead of the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:43 quicker, so 6:12 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Doubles Open · Women, with Katie Bowler, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 4 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Women1:30:04 PB377/887Beat 58%
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:23:17 PB218/585Beat 63%
↑ 283 days after Manchester 2026, with Katie Bowler 2:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:29 better than the field: 6:12 faster on the clock, against 3:43 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:43 faster This pair6:12 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Pro · Women1:27:55 PB258/314Beat 18%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Kirsty Wade 7:51 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:51 better than the field: 11:22 faster on the clock, against 3:31 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →3:31 faster This pair11:22 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Women1:29:29106/198Beat 47%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:22:44 PB513/824Beat 38%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:39:17151/163Beat 7%