Progress against the field
Between London 2025 and Birmingham 2026, Jessica Beasley lost 13:29 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:09 quicker, so 10:20 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
The longest gap between two races compared here, 331 days between London Excel 2025 and Birmingham 2026, cost 9:01 on the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
6 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Pro · Women1:25:26156/280Beat 44%
↑ 331 days after London Excel 2025 9:01 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:01 behind the field: 8:20 slower on the clock, against 0:41 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:41 faster This athlete8:20 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:16:1593/554Beat 83%
↑ 153 days after Birmingham 2025, with Emma Lea 4:24 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:42 slower on the clock in a race that was 2:42 faster for everyone: 4:24 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:42 faster This pair1:42 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Pro · Women1:17:0674/315Beat 77%
↑ 215 days after London 2025 4:28 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
4:28 behind the field: 2:00 slower on the clock, against 2:28 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:28 faster This athlete2:00 slower -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Women1:14:33 PB162/1111Beat 85%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:28 PB25/748Beat 97%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Pro · Women1:15:06 PB27/113Beat 76%