Progress against the field
Between Manchester 2024 and London 2025, Caroline Isaacs Smith and Emma Langridge lost 4:04 to the field.
The clock says 0:14 faster, but the races themselves got 4:18 quicker for everyone.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
5 races · 5 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Relay · Women1:16:4338/87Beat 56%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:37193/404Beat 52%
-
Katowice21 Feb 2026Doubles Open · Women1:24:09 PB122/255Beat 52%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Women1:44:361025/1118Beat 8%
↑ 175 days after Manchester 2024, with Emma Langridge 4:04 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:14 faster on the clock, yet the race was 4:18 faster for everyone, so 4:04 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:18 faster This pair0:14 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Women1:44:50456/486Beat 6%