Progress against the field
From Birmingham 2025 to London Olympia 2026, Jack Sadler and Jenna Sadler got 0:25 faster than the field.
Over the same races everyone got 5:41 quicker, so 6:06 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
4 races · 4 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:09:47 PB78/414Beat 81%
↑ 13 days after Glasgow 2026, with Jenna Sadler 2:51 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:22 faster on the clock, yet the race was 3:13 faster for everyone, so 2:51 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:13 faster This pair0:22 faster -
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:10:09173/1198Beat 86%
↑ 97 days after London Excel 2025, with Jenna Sadler 1:52 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
The race was 0:20 slower for everyone and the clock still says 1:32 faster: 1:52 gained on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:20 slower This pair1:32 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:41314/1372Beat 77%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025, with Jenna Sadler 1:24 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:24 better than the field: 4:12 faster on the clock, against 2:48 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:48 faster This pair4:12 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:15:53298/889Beat 67%