Progress against the field
Between Rome 2025 and London Excel 2025, Katie Skellett lost 9:15 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 3:48 quicker, so 5:27 slower on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Open · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 7 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Women1:00:01 PB4/1246Beat 100%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Elana Albery 0:29 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:03 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:34 faster for everyone, so 0:29 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →1:34 faster This pair2:03 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:02:043/277Beat 99%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Women1:17:03163/1379Beat 88%
↑ 69 days after Rome 2025 9:15 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
5:27 slower on the clock in a race that was 3:48 faster for everyone: 9:15 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →3:48 faster This athlete5:27 slower -
Rome26 Sep 2025Doubles Open · Women1:06:4514/673Beat 98%
-
Rome26 Sep 2025Individual Open · Women1:11:36 PB13/520Beat 98%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:00:50 PB27/956Beat 97%
-
Katowice22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Women1:18:2246/272Beat 83%
-
London29 Nov 2024Individual Open · Women1:29:37330/940Beat 65%