Progress against the field
Between Dublin 2024 and Glasgow 2025, Lisa Oakley lost 8:58 to the field.
The races themselves barely changed, so 8:40 slower on the clock is the real picture.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown. The summary above covers Individual Pro · Women, the one raced most; every comparison is in the list below.
Every race
8 races · 8 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:39:25508/586Beat 13%
↑ 221 days after London Olympia 2026, with Paul Jebb 4:51 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:46 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:05 faster for everyone: 4:51 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:05 faster This pair3:46 slower -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Mixed1:35:39772/887Beat 13%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:31:44 PB494/594Beat 17%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:40:52 PB153/163Beat 6%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:44:38224/233Beat 4%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Individual Pro · Women1:50:46119/127Beat 6%
↑ 117 days after Dublin 2024 8:58 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:40 slower on the clock in a race that was 0:18 faster for everyone: 8:58 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:18 faster This athlete8:40 slower -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Relay · Women1:26:0092/145Beat 37%
-
Dublin15 Nov 2024Individual Pro · Women1:42:06 PB37/45Beat 18%