Progress against the field
Kieran Hodgson has dropped 0:34 behind the field from Glasgow 2024 to Birmingham 2026.
The clock says 16:59 faster, but the races themselves got 17:33 quicker for everyone.
328 days between Glasgow 2024 and Manchester 2025 is the longest gap compared here, and the second race was 3:19 behind the field.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 11 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Individual Open · Men1:14:12 PB188/677Beat 72%
↑ 234 days after Glasgow 2026 7:32 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:32 better than the field: 10:26 faster on the clock, against 2:54 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →2:54 faster This athlete10:26 faster -
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men59:46 PB51/813Beat 94%
-
Glasgow11 Mar 2026Individual Open · Men1:24:38761/1452Beat 48%
↑ 49 days after Manchester 2026 2:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:06 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:25 faster for everyone, which leaves this 2:19 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:25 faster This athlete0:06 faster -
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Men1:24:44785/1463Beat 46%
↑ 48 days after London Excel 2025 8:40 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
9:47 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:07 slower for everyone: 8:40 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:07 slower This athlete9:47 slower -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:57726/2771Beat 74%
↑ 43 days after Birmingham 2025 0:15 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:17 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:02 faster for everyone, so 0:15 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:02 faster This athlete3:17 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Men1:18:14590/1821Beat 68%
↑ 215 days after Malaga 2025 0:33 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 0:46 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:33 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →0:46 faster This athlete0:13 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:18:27414/966Beat 57%
↑ 27 days after Vienna 2025 2:33 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:33 better than the field: 2:36 faster on the clock, against 0:03 faster for everyone.
The fieldCompare these two →0:03 faster This athlete2:36 faster -
Vienna22 Feb 2025Individual Open · Men1:21:03776/1356Beat 43%
↑ 29 days after Manchester 2025 3:57 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
7:37 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:40 faster for everyone, so 3:57 of it was this athlete.
The fieldCompare these two →3:40 faster This athlete7:37 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Individual Open · Men1:28:40783/1191Beat 34%
↑ 328 days after Glasgow 2024 3:19 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
2:31 faster on the clock, yet the race was 5:50 faster for everyone, so 3:19 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →5:50 faster This athlete2:31 faster -
Manchester9 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Mixed1:17:21 PB205/410Beat 50%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Individual Open · Men1:31:111112/1784Beat 38%