Progress against the field
Between Malaga 2025 and London Excel 2025, Nick Mcculloch lost 0:21 to the field.
Over the same races everyone got 2:02 quicker, so 1:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 6 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:03:43 PB154/813Beat 81%
-
London Excel4 Dec 2025Individual Open · Men1:15:43 PB832/2779Beat 70%
↑ 258 days after Malaga 2025 0:21 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:41 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 2:02 faster for everyone, which leaves this 0:21 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →2:02 faster This athlete1:41 faster -
Malaga21 Mar 2025Individual Open · Men1:17:24159/534Beat 70%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Pro · Men1:06:33 PB49/122Beat 60%
-
Sports Direct HYROX London4 May 2024Doubles Open · Men1:04:47174/1033Beat 83%
-
London26 Nov 2023Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:15 PB185/909Beat 80%
-
London26 Nov 2023Individual Pro · Men1:19:00 PB131/321Beat 59%