Progress against the field
Between London 2024 and London Olympia 2026, Daniel Blunn and Jamie Blunn kept pace with the field.
Over the same races everyone got 6:12 quicker, so 6:17 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
The largest gain on the field came from London 2024 → Glasgow 2025: 5:01 in 103 days.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
7 races · 7 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:29178/813Beat 78%
↑ 325 days after London 2025, with Jamie Blunn 0:00 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
1:55 faster on the clock, and the race was 1:55 faster for everyone. Whatever changed, it changed for all of them.
The fieldCompare these two →1:55 faster This pair1:55 faster -
London Excel4 Dec 2025Doubles Open · MenDNF—
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:06:24305/1010Beat 70%
↑ 52 days after Glasgow 2025, with Jamie Blunn 4:56 worse than the field Why ↓Close ↑
3:44 slower on the clock in a race that was 1:12 faster for everyone: 4:56 lost to the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:12 faster This pair3:44 slower -
Paris 118 Apr 2025Individual Open · Men1:14:08 PB356/1422Beat 75%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Men1:02:40 PB201/947Beat 79%
↑ 103 days after London 2024, with Jamie Blunn 5:01 better than the field Why ↓Close ↑
8:06 faster on the clock, and the race was 3:05 faster for everyone, so 5:01 of it was this pair.
The fieldCompare these two →3:05 faster This pair8:06 faster -
Manchester24 Jan 2025Doubles Open · Men1:24:45527/616Beat 14%
-
London29 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:10:46216/444Beat 51%