Progress against the field
From Glasgow 2024 to London 2025, the field gained 3:32 on Andrew Lane and Adam Arnold.
Over the same races everyone got 4:05 quicker, so 0:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
11 races · 10 events
-
Birmingham31 Oct 2026Doubles Open · Men1:04:55 PB138/605Beat 77%
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Men1:19:06557/813Beat 32%
-
Dublin12 Nov 2025Doubles Open · Men1:13:52430/777Beat 45%
-
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:11:52 PB132/176Beat 25%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:11:47 PB66/267Beat 75%
-
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Men1:15:1074/93Beat 20%
-
London3 May 2025Doubles Open · Men1:10:45503/1010Beat 50%
↑ 427 days after Glasgow 2024, with Adam Arnold 3:32 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:33 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 4:05 faster for everyone, which leaves this 3:32 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →4:05 faster This pair0:33 faster -
Dublin15 Nov 2024Doubles Open · Men1:16:31463/638Beat 27%
-
Toronto5 Oct 2024Doubles Open · Men1:22:08105/179Beat 41%
-
Glasgow2 Mar 2024Doubles Open · Men1:11:18345/787Beat 56%
-
Manchester28 Jan 2023Individual Open · Men1:25:16 PB247/649Beat 62%