Progress against the field
From London 2025 to Manchester 2026, the field gained 2:10 on Millie Foley.
Over the same races everyone got 3:13 quicker, so 1:03 faster on the clock looks better than it was.
How this is worked out ⓘ
A finish time moves for two reasons: the athlete, and the race — its course, its floor, its day. For each pair of races in a row in one category, we take everyone who raced both and use the middle of how much they moved (the median) as "the race". Whatever is left is the athlete. Doubles are compared only when the same two people raced both, and told as the pair's; relays are left out. A pair with fewer than 15 athletes in common is not shown.
Every race
6 races · 6 events
-
London Olympia24 Mar 2026Doubles Open · Women1:00:58 PB2/867Beat 100%
-
Manchester21 Jan 2026Individual Open · Women1:18:04 PB25/268Beat 91%
↑ 91 days after Birmingham 2025 1:22 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:13 faster on the clock looks better than it was: the race was 1:35 faster for everyone, which leaves this 1:22 behind the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:35 faster This athlete0:13 faster -
Birmingham22 Oct 2025Individual Open · Women1:18:1799/829Beat 88%
↑ 172 days after London 2025 0:48 worse than the field Faster on the clock, behind the field Why ↓Close ↑
0:50 faster on the clock, yet the race was 1:38 faster for everyone, so 0:48 was lost on the field.
The fieldCompare these two →1:38 faster This athlete0:50 faster -
Cardiff30 May 2025Doubles Pro · Women1:06:38 PB8/65Beat 88%
-
London3 May 2025Individual Open · Women1:19:07248/1368Beat 82%
-
Glasgow12 Mar 2025Doubles Open · Mixed1:12:50 PB186/861Beat 78%